IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivers Murnieks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-07-31 Country: Latvia
2026 · Round 4, Pick #124  ·  Buffalo Sabres Buffalo Sabres
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 52 15 20 35 0.673 0.3971 0.4415 2.0216 2.2478
2025-26 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 31 7 13 20 0.645 0.3170 0.3389 1.7229 1.8419
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11696
Forward overall
#134
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Hudson Fasching
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Galt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Jenkins
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joel L'Esperance
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Landan Resendes
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Nikita Nesterenko
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.79
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Jack Dempsey
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Trevor Kuntar
USHL 2018-19
0.43
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Tarantino
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Kennedy
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.