← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivers Murnieks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-07-31 Country: Latvia
2026 NHL Draft Eligible  (Intl)
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 52 15 20 35 0.673 0.4286 0.4765 2.0171 2.2428
2025-26 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 31 7 13 20 0.645 0.3213 0.3435 1.7215 1.8404
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6783
Forward overall
#99
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.65
actual FR PPG at Boston College
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston College
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.