IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Dempsey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dexter NE-Prep 30 6 8 14 0.467 0.0925 0.0925 0.2126 0.2126
2019-20 Dexter NE-Prep 30 16 30 46 1.533 0.3037 0.3037 0.6986 0.6986
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 28 7 8 15 0.536 0.2184 0.2184 0.4306 0.4306
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2021-22 · Boston College
-11.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14415
Forward overall
#672
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Collins
Elmira · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Wilson
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Collazo
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.