IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Wolford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Cornwall Colts CCHL 51 14 15 29 0.569 0.1233 0.1268 0.4355 0.4478
2009-10 — CCHL 30 7 18 25 0.833 0.1807 0.1775 0.6383 0.6268
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 2 1 0 1 0.500
2010-11 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 15 1 4 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2010-11 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+147.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24180
Forward overall
#899
Forward born in 1990
#477
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2002-03
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mat Hehr
Fredonia · 2007-08
1.300 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Levi Wunder
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.