IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Greco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 39 9 13 22 0.564 0.1383 0.1411 0.3861 0.3940
2002-03 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 57 8 13 21 0.368 0.2173 0.2080 1.0854 1.0388
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Amherst D3 — SR 25 9 9 18 0.720
2004-05 Amherst D3 — JR 18 9 10 19 1.056
2003-04 Amherst D3 — SO 23 13 8 21 0.913
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.91
2003-04 · Amherst
+488.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27665
Forward overall
#798
Forward born in 1983

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.