IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Yegor Shilov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-30 Country: Russia
2026 · Round 2, Pick #43  ·  Colorado Avalanche Colorado Avalanche
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 39 11 17 28 0.718 0.4235 0.4655 2.1542 2.3681
2025-26 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 63 32 50 82 1.302 0.6395 0.6756 3.4748 3.6709
2026-27 Victoriaville Tigres QMJHL 8 4 6 10 1.250 0.6141 0.6141 3.3370 3.3370
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4712
Forward overall
#28
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Sheldon Dries
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Ortega
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schilkey
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.70 D1 FR PPG)
0.71 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Scott Conway
USHL 2013-14
0.76
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Charlie Cerrato
USHL 2023-24
1.11
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Christian Sarlo
USHL 2019-20
0.52
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Denis Smirnov
USHL 2015-16
1.21
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.