IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Morello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-31 Country: Canada
2024 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #154  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 — OJHL 51 16 24 40 0.784 0.2356 0.2659 0.5369 0.6060
2023-24 — OJHL 50 25 32 57 1.140 0.3425 0.3688 0.7803 0.8403
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 59 8 20 28 0.475 0.2917 0.2951 1.3983 1.4148
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HockeyEast SO 36 6 7 13 0.361
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2025-26 · Boston University
+30.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16164
Forward overall
#660
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.26 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2020-21
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
New England · 2011-12
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gallegos
Tufts · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.