IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brenden Bradbury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-06-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 55 2 6 8 0.145 0.0280 0.0290 0.0917 0.0951
2007-08 — MJHL 58 3 18 21 0.362 0.0697 0.0685 0.2282 0.2244
2008-09 — MJHL 63 6 15 21 0.333 0.0642 0.0600 0.2100 0.1961
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 27 2 11 13 0.481
2010-11 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 19 0 4 4 0.210
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 7 1 1 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2009-10 · St. Scholastica
+377.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20149
Defenseman overall
#1704
Defenseman born in 1988
#1549
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer Barrow
Elmira · 2024-25
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Forbort
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Delmonico
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.