IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Sinclair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 43 3 7 10 0.233 0.0596 0.0610 0.1753 0.1794
2015-16 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 58 13 32 45 0.776 0.1988 0.1937 0.5849 0.5699
2016-17 — SJHL 46 17 34 51 1.109 0.2840 0.2626 0.8357 0.7727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 36 2 6 8 0.222
2018-19 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 33 3 1 4 0.121
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 34 2 4 6 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2017-18 · Alaska Anchorage
-20.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4752
Defenseman overall
#885
Defenseman born in 1996
#282
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Rooney
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.