← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kade Stengrim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-09 Country: USA
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Brainerd USHS-MN 26 18 14 32 1.231 0.1558 0.1558 0.2990 0.2990
2023-24 Brainerd USHS-MN 27 24 19 43 1.593 0.2016 0.2016 0.3868 0.3868
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 50 11 6 17 0.340 0.2006 0.2116 1.0212 1.0770
2025-26 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 66 25 19 44 0.667 0.3243 0.3255 1.6359 1.6422
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15115
Forward overall
#418
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
NAHL 2019-20
0.81
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.