IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Yaroslav Bryzgalov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-23 Country: Belarus
2026 · Round 4, Pick #97  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 51 10 7 17 0.333 0.1966 0.2052 1.0010 1.0450
2025-26 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 64 13 42 55 0.859 0.4181 0.4152 2.1087 2.0942
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13550
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jake Randolph
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cam Darcy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alex Jefferies
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.83
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Vann Yuhas
AJHL 2022-23
0.12
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Chase Olsen
AJHL 2015-16
0.08
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Devlin O'Brien
BCHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2021-22
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.