← New Search ↗ Social Card

Yaroslav Bryzgalov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-23 Country: Belarus
2026 · Round 4, Pick #97  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 51 10 7 17 0.333 0.1966 0.2052 1.0001 1.0441
2025-26 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 64 13 42 55 0.859 0.4181 0.4152 2.0993 2.0849
2026-27 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 3 2 0 2 0.667 0.3243 0.3243 1.6285 1.6285
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13798
Forward overall
#384
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.83
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2018-19
0.14
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
BCHL 2018-19
0.42
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2023-24
0.47
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.