IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Ayotte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Cornwall Colts CCHL 27 2 4 6 0.222 0.0482 0.0484 0.1719 0.1726
2007-08 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 22 24 46 0.958 0.2349 0.2231 0.6598 0.6266
2008-09 Wellington Dukes OJHL 51 32 32 64 1.255 0.3076 0.2764 0.8640 0.7762
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 30 13 11 24 0.800
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 29 8 12 20 0.690
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 5 0 2 2 0.400
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 14 2 0 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
-34.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18199
Forward overall
#671
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Johnson
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Clerc
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.