← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Ayotte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Cornwall Colts CCHL 27 2 4 6 0.222 0.0634 0.0637 0.1720 0.1727
2007-08 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 22 24 46 0.958 0.2677 0.2542 0.6613 0.6280
2008-09 Wellington Dukes OJHL 51 32 32 64 1.255 0.3506 0.3150 0.8660 0.7780
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 SR 30 13 11 24 0.800
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 29 8 12 20 0.690
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 5 0 2 2 0.400
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 14 2 0 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
-42.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13739
Forward overall
#617
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.