← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph McGraw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-13 Country: USA
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Northeast Generals NAHL 26 3 0 3 0.115 0.0424 0.0498 0.1218 0.1430
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 43 5 7 12 0.279 0.1025 0.1153 0.2946 0.3313
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 59 22 16 38 0.644 0.2366 0.2548 0.6798 0.7320
2024-25 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 25 7 9 16 0.640 0.3775 0.3701 1.9222 1.8844
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 49 13 20 33 0.673 0.3973 0.3703 2.0228 1.8853
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8006
Forward overall
#302
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
OJHL 2017-18
0.26
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.31
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.