IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Woods Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 7 3 10 0.227 0.0488 0.0514 0.1113 0.1171
2014-15 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 42 6 14 20 0.476 0.1022 0.1028 — —
2015-16 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 19 2 0 2 0.105 0.0304 0.0288 0.0793 0.0750
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 27 1 7 8 0.296
2018-19 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 22 4 3 7 0.318
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2016-17 · Stevenson
+540.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27752
Forward overall
#1133
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Arnold
Saint Mary's · 2014-15
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Faupel
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Skalski
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.