← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Arnold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-07-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1470 0.1541 0.4222 0.4425
2013-14 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 44 1 3 4 0.091 0.0210 0.0211 0.0445 0.0446
2014-15 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 44 2 12 14 0.318 0.0735 0.0703 0.1557 0.1488
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 MIAC SR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 17 0 4 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+392.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20738
Defenseman overall
#2164
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2013-14
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.