IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Arnold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-07-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1485 0.1556 0.4235 0.4439
2013-14 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 44 1 3 4 0.091 0.0195 0.0196 0.0445 0.0446
2014-15 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights EHL 44 2 12 14 0.318 0.0683 0.0653 0.1558 0.1489
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint Mary's D3 — SR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2017-18 Saint Mary's D3 — JR 24 1 3 4 0.167
2016-17 Saint Mary's D3 — SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Saint Mary's D3 — FR 17 0 4 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Saint Mary's
+430.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21784
Defenseman overall
#2234
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Crabtree
Canton · 2013-14
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Denis Valenta
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Moore
Lawrence · 2001-02
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.