IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Faupel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — MJHL 50 7 10 17 0.340 0.0962 0.0955 0.2142 0.2127
2012-13 Dauphin Kings MJHL 59 8 12 20 0.339 0.0959 0.0905 0.2136 0.2015
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 25 0 7 7 0.280
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 19 0 5 5 0.263
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 18 3 1 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Superior
+154.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12871
Defenseman overall
#1608
Defenseman born in 1992
#1552
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Jensen
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Garrity
Suffolk · 2017-18
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.