← New Search ↗ Social Card

Darian Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-12-22 Country: USA
2026 · Round 6, Pick #163  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Leamington Flyers OJHL 53 19 19 38 0.717 0.1757 0.1927 0.4935 0.5411
2024-25 Lincoln Stars USHL 44 5 11 16 0.364 0.2145 0.2213 1.0911 1.1255
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 60 20 25 45 0.750 0.4339 0.4254 1.9638 1.9251
2026-27 Flint Firebirds OHL 6 5 3 8 1.333 0.7713 0.7713 3.4911 3.4911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14804
Forward overall
#591
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2015-16
0.59
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
OHL 2023-24
0.66
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHL 2019-20
0.77
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.