IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dryden Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-09 Country: Canada
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Niagara Falls Canucks OJHL 56 2 23 25 0.446 0.1094 0.1234 0.3073 0.3466
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 3 12 15 0.250 0.1475 0.1568 0.7509 0.7982
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 68 3 21 24 0.353 0.2042 0.2066 0.9068 0.9175
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8807
Defenseman overall
#1223
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matt Basgall
USHL 2020-21
0.45
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Matthew Lahey
USHL 2024-25
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Butrus Ghafari
USHL 2014-15
0.05
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Powell Connor
BCHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2007-08
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.