IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin English Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 16 28 44 0.898 0.2201 0.2372 0.6183 0.6664
2007-08 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 9 19 28 0.571 0.1401 0.1447 0.3934 0.4062
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 9 0 3 3 0.333
2010-11 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2009-10 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 10 1 2 3 0.300
2008-09 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#26644
Forward overall
#898
Forward born in 1989
#1271
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kowin Belsterling
Chatham · 2022-23
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian La Croix
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Anderson
Hamilton · 2007-08
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.