IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor McGraw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 2 6 8 0.136 0.0294 0.0296 0.1049 0.1056
2008-09 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 8 18 26 0.441 0.0956 0.0906 0.3409 0.3232
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 21 3 4 7 0.333
2012-13 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 5 2 2 4 0.800
2011-12 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 21 2 4 6 0.286
2010-11 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 10 1 0 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2010-11 · Buffalo State
+76.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46716
Forward overall
#1557
Forward born in 1989
#1374
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Sanchez
Aurora · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Vella
Skidmore · 2015-16
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jameson Raymond
Lawrence · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.