IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 44 14 20 34 0.773 0.2321 0.2418 0.5289 0.5510
2007-08 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 47 13 21 34 0.723 0.2173 0.2165 0.4952 0.4935
2008-09 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 47 14 22 36 0.766 0.2301 0.2175 0.5243 0.4956
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 9 0 3 3 0.333
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 10 2 1 3 0.300
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 1 0 1 1 1.000
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2009-10 · SUNY Geneseo
+19.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24288
Forward overall
#805
Forward born in 1989
#1382
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Rintel
Worcester State · 2005-06
1.048 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Callum Hofford
Salem State · 2013-14
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.