IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Rintel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 38 2 13 15 0.395 0.1564 0.1588 0.4144 0.4208
2005-06 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 57 13 17 30 0.474 0.1877 0.1813 0.4973 0.4804
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Worcester State D3 — SR 25 13 17 30 1.200
2008-09 Worcester State D3 — JR 23 12 10 22 0.957
2007-08 Worcester State D3 — SO 6 4 5 9 1.500
2006-07 Worcester State D3 — FR 21 9 13 22 1.048
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.05
2006-07 · Worcester State
+610.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32274
Forward overall
#1039
Forward born in 1986
#3071
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Amante
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Zimmerman
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Auggie Moore
Saint John's · 2017-18
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.