IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhys Wallin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-03 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Wayzata USHS-MN 27 7 16 23 0.852 0.1079 0.1079 0.2069 0.2069
2022-23 Wayzata USHS-MN 28 13 22 35 1.250 0.1583 0.1583 0.3036 0.3036
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1470 0.1556 0.4222 0.4470
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 43 6 6 12 0.279 0.1646 0.1584 0.8382 0.8066
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 60 12 20 32 0.533 0.3146 0.2875 1.6017 1.4639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15732
Forward overall
#815
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Reese Farrell
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army
Mason Krueger
NAHL 2016-17
0.18
actual FR PPG at Army
Hunter McCoy
NAHL 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Army
John Keranen
NAHL 2018-19
0.42
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Weber
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Van Natter
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Rey
Neumann · 2009-10
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.