← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Brady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-21 Country: Canada
Michigan Tech
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 44 6 20 26 0.591 0.1982 0.2121 0.5468 0.5852
2023-24 Langley Rivermen BCHL 53 2 11 13 0.245 0.0945 0.0969 0.3570 0.3660
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 2 10 12 0.203 0.1200 0.1138 0.6109 0.5791
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 45 2 6 8 0.178 0.1049 0.0944 0.5340 0.4805
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15541
Defenseman overall
#2936
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Tech Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.20
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.13
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan Tech

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.