IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Horn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 39 4 12 16 0.410 0.0890 0.0900 0.3176 0.3211
2015-16 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 57 12 25 37 0.649 0.1408 0.1355 0.5025 0.4838
2016-17 — SJHL 52 13 18 31 0.596 0.1527 0.1416 0.4418 0.4096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Potsdam D1 — JR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2018-19 Potsdam D1 — SO 25 4 11 15 0.600
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 25 4 11 15 0.600
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 25 5 3 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2017-18 · SUNY Potsdam
+168.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31612
Forward overall
#1330
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Williams
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Kudynski
Lebanon Valley · 2004-05
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.