IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Albrecht Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 42 6 7 13 0.309 0.0793 0.0823 0.2333 0.2420
2017-18 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 48 19 17 36 0.750 0.1921 0.1904 0.5654 0.5605
2018-19 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 56 33 56 89 1.589 0.4072 0.3827 1.1980 1.1259
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 North Dakota D1 NCHC — 26 2 1 3 0.115
2022-23 North Dakota D1 NCHC SR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2021-22 North Dakota D1 NCHC JR 29 2 4 6 0.207
2020-21 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 13 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 North Dakota D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14849
Forward overall
#683
Forward born in 1998
#108
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Moncovich
Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.