← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Fletcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 SJHL 41 4 6 10 0.244 0.0625 0.0649 0.1839 0.1910
2017-18 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 22 6 10 16 0.727 0.1863 0.1849 0.5482 0.5441
2018-19 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 47 13 21 34 0.723 0.1853 0.1744 0.5453 0.5131
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 5 9 14 0.560
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 26 7 8 15 0.577
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC FR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 25 4 4 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+109.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30359
Forward overall
#1502
Forward born in 1998
#596
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.