← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Paradise Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Melville Millionaires SJHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.0769 0.0756 0.2223 0.2186
2017-18 Melville Millionaires SJHL 43 7 5 12 0.279 0.0715 0.0670 0.2068 0.1938
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 17 2 3 5 0.294
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2018-19 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+50.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49298
Forward overall
#2515
Forward born in 1997
#1608
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2009-10
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.