IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Peddle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-23 Country: Canada
2025 · Round 3, Pick #91  ·  Pittsburgh Penguins Pittsburgh Penguins
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 62 3 7 10 0.161 0.0952 0.1002 0.4844 0.5097
2025-26 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 62 3 16 19 0.306 0.1506 0.1520 0.8184 0.8262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13037
Defenseman overall
#1714
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Powell Connor
BCHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Butrus Ghafari
USHL 2014-15
0.05
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Matthew Lahey
USHL 2024-25
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Aiden Gallacher
USHL 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Pavit Mehra
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Prifrel
Worcester State · 2019-20
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Morgan
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
1.517 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.