IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Virgoe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-04-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Seguin Bruins OJHL 48 2 4 6 0.125 0.0349 0.0366 0.0863 0.0905
2007-08 Seguin Bruins OJHL 34 3 4 7 0.206 0.0575 0.0577 0.1421 0.1426
2008-09 — OJHL 47 2 9 11 0.234 0.0654 0.0623 0.1615 0.1538
2009-10 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 49 7 21 28 0.571 0.1596 0.1436 0.3943 0.3548
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 22 1 7 8 0.364
2011-12 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 25 0 8 8 0.320
2010-11 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11432
Defenseman overall
#1370
Defenseman born in 1989
#3516
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Pahos
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Novick
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dominic Brenza
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.