| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Mounds View | USHS-MN | 20 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.650 | 0.0823 | 0.0823 | 0.1579 | 0.1579 |
| 2021-22 | Mounds View | USHS-MN | 24 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 1.208 | 0.1530 | 0.1530 | 0.2935 | 0.2935 |
| 2022-23 | Mounds View | USHS-MN | 25 | 22 | 28 | 50 | 2.000 | 0.2532 | 0.2532 | 0.4858 | 0.4858 |
| 2023-24 | Mounds View | USHS-MN | 26 | 31 | 20 | 51 | 1.962 | 0.2483 | 0.2483 | 0.4764 | 0.4764 |
| 2024-25 | Youngstown Phantoms | USHL | 33 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.182 | 0.1072 | 0.1052 | 0.5460 | 0.5358 |
| 2025-26 | Philadelphia Rebels | NAHL | 19 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.895 | 0.3287 | 0.3209 | 0.9444 | 0.9219 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.