← New Search ↗ Social Card

Allan Charbonneau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-06-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Rockland Nationals CCHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0241 0.0267 0.0860 0.0952
2003-04 Rockland Nationals CCHL 49 1 6 7 0.143 0.0310 0.0328 0.1106 0.1169
2004-05 Brockville Braves CCHL 43 2 5 7 0.163 0.0353 0.0358 0.1260 0.1277
2005-06 Brockville Braves CCHL 54 5 11 16 0.296 0.0643 0.0623 0.2292 0.2222
2006-07 Brockville Braves CCHL 54 3 12 15 0.278 0.0603 0.0555 0.2149 0.1977
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2008-09 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 13 0 1 1 0.077
2007-08 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 17 1 4 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2007-08 · SUNY Geneseo
+434.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20063
Defenseman overall
#1639
Defenseman born in 1986
#1589
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2024-25
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.