IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody George Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-25 Country: USA
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 49 5 4 9 0.184 0.1365 0.1384 0.6855 0.6949
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 30 1 6 7 0.233 0.1734 0.1663 0.8705 0.8347
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51906
Forward overall
#1101
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dylan Pavelek
NTDP-U18 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Gavin Best
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Gianluca Esteves
MJHL 2014-15
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Tiernan Shoudy
USHL 2019-20
0.32
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Hosmer
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.