← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-05-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Wellington Dukes OJHL 47 0 3 3 0.064 0.0156 0.0170 0.0439 0.0479
2005-06 Wellington Dukes OJHL 36 1 8 9 0.250 0.0613 0.0647 0.1719 0.1814
2006-07 Wellington Dukes OJHL 46 4 12 16 0.348 0.0852 0.0856 0.2392 0.2404
2007-08 Wellington Dukes OJHL 31 2 11 13 0.419 0.1028 0.0987 0.2884 0.2768
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 23 1 0 1 0.043
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 21 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 20 0 4 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2008-09 · SUNY Oswego
+126.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15899
Defenseman overall
#1496
Defenseman born in 1988
#3183
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2016-17
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2003-04
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.