IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonas Kemps Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-16 Country: USA
2026 · Round 4, Pick #98  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 49 0 4 4 0.082 0.0607 0.0615 0.3060 0.3098
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 57 2 7 9 0.158 0.0931 0.0965 0.4738 0.4912
2026-27 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.4865 0.4865 2.4427 2.4427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19890
Defenseman overall
#1149
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Will Butcher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Nuttle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.41 No data
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matt Basgall
USHL 2021-22
0.45
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Dennis Cesana
AJHL 2017-18
0.67
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Chase Reid
OHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Nash Nienhuis
USHL 2019-20
0.16
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.