IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonas Kemps Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-16 Country: USA
2026 · Round 4, Pick #98  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 49 0 4 4 0.082 0.0607 0.0615 0.3045 0.3083
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 57 2 7 9 0.158 0.0931 0.0965 0.4742 0.4916
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19657
Defenseman overall
#1039
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Cecere
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mitch Eliot
USHL 2015-16
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Nash Nienhuis
USHL 2017-18
0.16
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Tommy Miller
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.28
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Zach Osburn
USHL 2014-15
0.51
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

J.B. Baker
Nichols · 2012-13
1.482 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2013-14
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Izzo
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.