IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ilya Kolmakov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-09-30 Country: Russia
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 1 1 1 2 2.000 1.1798 1.3216 6.0014 6.7229
2025-26 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 62 13 35 48 0.774 0.3804 0.4098 2.0668 2.2268
2026-27 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 6 2 5 7 1.167 0.5732 0.5732 3.1146 3.1146
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10497
Forward overall
#135
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Austin Cangelosi
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Boston College (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brendan Harms
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Alex Kile
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan Conmy
USHL 2022-23
0.91
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Shane Eiserman
USHL 2013-14
0.43
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Angus Crookshank
BCHL 2017-18
0.64
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Cy LeClerc
NCDC 2020-21
0.57
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.