← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolen Geerdes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-04-30 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rogers USHS-MN 28 3 20 23 0.821 0.1040 0.1040 0.1994 0.1994
2023-24 Rogers USHS-MN 27 7 36 43 1.593 0.2016 0.2016 0.3867 0.3867
2024-25 Rogers USHS-MN 30 11 35 46 1.533 0.1941 0.1941 1.5004 1.5742
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 61 6 23 29 0.475 0.2804 0.2806 1.4265 1.4278
2026-27 Madison Capitols USHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2279
Defenseman overall
#299
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SuperElit 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2012-13
0.15
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2017-18
0.22
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.