IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dayton Deics Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Estevan Bruins SJHL 47 3 10 13 0.277 0.0799 0.0799 0.2082 0.2082
2020-21 Estevan Bruins SJHL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.1444 0.1444 0.3764 0.3764
2021-22 Estevan Bruins SJHL 58 10 25 35 0.603 0.1743 0.1676 0.4542 0.4368
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 3 18 21 0.677
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 31 5 12 17 0.548
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 3 15 18 0.621
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 20 0 9 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2022-23 · St. Norbert
+184.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8325
Defenseman overall
#1212
Defenseman born in 2001
#1158
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Webb
Suffolk · 2021-22
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Blake
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.