IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Banwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-12-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Ajax Attack OJHL 43 1 13 14 0.326 0.0978 0.1067 0.2229 0.2432
2008-09 — OJHL 41 6 12 18 0.439 0.1319 0.1371 0.3005 0.3124
2009-10 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 48 3 12 15 0.312 0.0939 0.0927 0.2139 0.2111
2010-11 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 26 3 12 15 0.577 0.1733 0.1630 0.3949 0.3714
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 24 4 13 17 0.708
2013-14 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 28 3 11 14 0.500
2012-13 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 26 1 11 12 0.462
2011-12 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 24 2 6 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2011-12 · Salem State
+161.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11884
Defenseman overall
#1405
Defenseman born in 1990
#2933
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Rasberg
New England · 2015-16
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Bella
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Zaleski
Becker · 2018-19
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.