← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luca Jarvis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-11-15 Country: USA
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Stillwater USHS-MN 23 9 10 19 0.826 0.1046 0.1046 0.2007 0.2007
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.2360 0.2659 1.2014 1.3534
2025-26 Tri-City Storm USHL 56 4 17 21 0.375 0.2212 0.2385 1.1263 1.2144
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16454
Forward overall
#220
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2023-24
0.58
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.32
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.