IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Kosick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-08-18 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 6, Pick #192  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0429 0.0476 0.2164 0.2402
2025-26 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 69 16 38 54 0.783 0.3807 0.4049 1.9203 2.0422
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22507
Forward overall
#328
Forward born in 2008
#802
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Hudson Fasching
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Karson Kuhlman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Galt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kyle Kukkonen
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.69
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Grant Slukynsky
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Alex Bump
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.95
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Michael Pastujov
NTDP-U18 2016-17
0.43
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Anderson
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.