IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Kosick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-08-18 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 6, Pick #192  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Calgary Hitmen WHL 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0429 0.0476 0.2154 0.2391
2025-26 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 69 16 38 54 0.783 0.3807 0.4049 1.9117 2.0330
2026-27 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 3 3 1 4 1.333 0.6487 0.6487 3.2569 3.2569
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22839
Forward overall
#387
Forward born in 2008
#858
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Austin Cangelosi
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Boston College (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Alex Kile
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Guentzel
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.22 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.73 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schilkey
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.70 D1 FR PPG)
0.71 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brendan Harms
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Josh Groll
USHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Alex Kile
USHL 2012-13
0.21
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Mackie Samoskevich
USHL 2020-21
0.72
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Brendan Brisson
USHL 2019-20
0.88
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.