IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Sokol Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-22 Country: USA
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0843 0.0915 0.4292 0.4660
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 29 4 4 8 0.276 0.1628 0.1689 0.8286 0.8596
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33439
Forward overall
#545
Forward born in 2008
#3076
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Wisconsin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Bruno Idzan
SHL-J20 2023-24
0.25
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Oscar Skiöld
SHL-J20 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Charlie Stramel
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.36
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Tarek Baker
USHL 2014-15
0.57
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Howie
Marian · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Byrne
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.