IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Jette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-09 Country: USA
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2949 0.3236 1.5017 1.6479
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 15 9 24 0.407 0.2400 0.2511 1.2218 1.2784
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 16 8 11 19 1.188 0.7005 0.6991 3.5665 3.5595
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5092
Forward overall
#66
Forward born in 2007
#240
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nick Schilkey
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.70 D1 FR PPG)
0.71 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG

Wisconsin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Seamus Malone
USHL 2014-15
0.74
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Linus Weissbach
USHL 2016-17
0.76
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Sam Stange
USHL 2019-20
0.24
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Bruno Idzan
USHL 2024-25
0.25
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.