| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.250 | 0.1537 | 0.1616 | 0.7366 | 0.7743 |
| 2019-20 | — | USHL | 48 | 26 | 19 | 45 | 0.938 | 0.5763 | 0.5763 | 2.7621 | 2.7621 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Nebraska Omaha | D1 | NCHC | — | 36 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 0.944 |
| 2023-24 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | — | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2022-23 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | JR | 34 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.324 |
| 2021-22 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | SO | 37 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.297 |
| 2020-21 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | FR | 29 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 0.241 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.