IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 24 4 7 11 0.458 0.0780 0.0761 0.1942 0.1895
2010-11 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 48 8 23 31 0.646 0.1100 0.1015 0.2737 0.2526
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Becker D3 — SR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2013-14 Becker D3 — JR 24 2 8 10 0.417
2012-13 Becker D3 — SO 23 2 9 11 0.478
2011-12 Becker D3 — FR 14 2 2 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2011-12 · Becker
+265.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39798
Forward overall
#1426
Forward born in 1990
#705
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Griffen Barr
Utica · 2022-23
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Politz
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.321 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
David Moncur
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.