IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Bosco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-08 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 31 17 19 36 1.161 0.2335 0.2335 0.5311 0.5311
2024-25 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 32 18 29 47 1.469 0.2954 0.2954 3.0007 3.2650
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 54 19 15 34 0.630 0.3714 0.3862 1.8892 1.9644
2026-27 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 7 4 4 8 1.143 0.6742 0.6742 3.4295 3.4295
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

92%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10189
Forward overall
#128
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sean Malone
SHL 2025-26
0.65
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Ryan Donato
USHL 2014-15
0.66
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Alex Laferriere
USHL 2020-21
0.89
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Joe Miller
USHL 2021-22
0.85
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.