IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Bosco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-08 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 31 17 19 36 1.161 0.2301 0.2301 0.5291 0.5291
2024-25 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 32 18 29 47 1.469 0.2910 0.2910 3.0034 3.2679
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 54 19 15 34 0.630 0.3714 0.3862 1.8909 1.9661
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9963
Forward overall
#102
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
Drew Melanson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alex Laferriere
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.89
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Richard Gallant
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.53
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Michael Floodstrand
NTDP-U18 2014-15
0.44
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Ryan Fine
USHL 2022-23
0.31
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2005-06
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.