IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Mason Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 49 4 6 10 0.204 0.0583 0.0612 0.1580 0.1657
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 3 26 29 0.537 0.1533 0.1518 0.4157 0.4117
2009-10 Cornwall Colts CCHL 61 5 49 54 0.885 0.2526 0.2385 0.6852 0.6470
2010-11 Collingwood Blues OJHL 47 5 20 25 0.532 0.1486 0.1326 0.3671 0.3275
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE SR 23 4 7 11 0.478
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE JR 15 3 10 13 0.867
2012-13 Curry D3 CNE SO 22 0 4 4 0.182
2011-12 Curry D3 CNE FR 24 1 3 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2011-12 · Curry
0.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4964
Defenseman overall
#951
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Turner Richards
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Nichols
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taeron Lewis
Norwich · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.