IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Geoffrey Gieni Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-10-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Abitibi Eskimos NOJHL 39 1 21 22 0.564 0.0803 0.0805 0.2349 0.2356
2010-11 Soo Thunderbirds NOJHL 48 7 20 27 0.562 0.0801 0.0761 0.2342 0.2225
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 24 1 8 9 0.375
2013-14 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 22 2 9 11 0.500
2012-13 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 23 0 11 11 0.478
2011-12 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 27 2 1 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2011-12 · St. Olaf
+51.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12489
Defenseman overall
#1436
Defenseman born in 1990
#699
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bill Walsh
Worcester State · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Cyprian
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Erickson
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.