IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Mott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Rockland Nationals CCHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0456 0.0460 0.1106 0.1116
2009-10 Rockland Nationals CCHL 52 5 22 27 0.519 0.1658 0.1597 0.4019 0.3870
2010-11 Navan Grads CCHL 59 10 28 38 0.644 0.2057 0.1879 0.4986 0.4555
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 11 1 2 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2011-12 · SUNY Geneseo
+63.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7333
Defenseman overall
#1097
Defenseman born in 1990
#820
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Ring-Jarvi
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Bullinger
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Roginski
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.