← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Nakagawa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club NCDC 45 5 4 9 0.200 0.0815 0.0801 0.1608 0.1580
2022-23 Philadelphia Hockey Club EHL 46 15 22 37 0.804 0.1858 0.1774 0.3935 0.3756
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 31 9 20 29 0.935
2024-25 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 31 9 20 29 0.935
2023-24 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 31 9 20 29 0.935
2022-23 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 31 9 20 29 0.935
2021-22 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 31 9 20 29 0.935
2020-21 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 31 9 20 29 0.935

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26092
Forward overall
#1471
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.