← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Langdon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-16 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 9 13 22 0.415 0.1017 0.1163 0.2857 0.3267
2023-24 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 41 5 8 13 0.317 0.1222 0.1349 0.4612 0.5090
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1211 0.6001 0.6161
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 23 4 3 7 0.304 0.1760 0.1717 0.7968 0.7772
2026-27 Niagara IceDogs OHL 6 2 4 6 1.000 0.5785 0.5785 2.6184 2.6184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31763
Forward overall
#1704
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
BCHL 2015-16
0.59
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
OHL 2024-25
0.67
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
QMJHL 2024-25
0.50
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.