← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Langdon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-16 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 9 13 22 0.415 0.1017 0.1163 0.2858 0.3268
2023-24 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 41 5 8 13 0.317 0.1222 0.1349 0.4615 0.5094
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1211 0.6007 0.6167
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 23 4 3 7 0.304 0.1760 0.1717 0.7819 0.7626
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31352
Forward overall
#1680
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2022-23
0.44
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
USHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
BCHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2016-17
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.